We asked for feedback on proposals to help ensure the ongoing, reliable supply of important medicines in Australia. Four proposals were consulted on which sought feedback on medicine shortage mitigation or management strategies that would:
We received 47 submissions in response to consultation from industry organisations and peak bodies, health professionals or heath professional organisations, consumer groups and individuals. Respondents provided a range of views and suggestions.
There was general support to enable import of overseas substitutes for discontinued medicines by granting annual charge waivers (proposal 4). Concerns were raised that the charge waiver may negatively impact fairness and sustainability of the TGA cost recovery system by shifting the waived annual charge cost onto other medicine sponsors. A concern was raised that this proposal will increase confusion for patients and healthcare professionals since more discontinued products would be included on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG), in order to allow the import of overseas substitutes.
Views were mixed on incentivising registration of medicines known to be in repeat or longstanding shortage (proposals 2 and 3). Some stakeholders raised that incentivising registration is unlikely to address the larger issue of shortages. Once registered, there is no guarantee of medicine supply, nor will the proposals overcome other barriers to supply, such as manufacturing issues. Concerns were raised that long term stability of supply is driven by commercial viability, and that TGA fees are not the major factor driving commercial viability. Waiving the fees would therefore have limited impact on supply of medicines. Some stakeholders identified evidence requirements as a barrier to registration, whereas others raised that changes should not result in reduced TGA submission standards.
Overall support for prioritising the registration of new generic medicines was poor (proposal 1). Stakeholders raised that prioritisation of new generics might displace existing products from the market thus failing to address the aim to create a more robust medicine supply. In addition, the TGA evaluation time was not seen as an impediment to the availability of generic products in Australia.
Since public consultation commenced in March 2021 two complementary strategies have been introduced that directly address the issue of medicine shortages.
In response to the consultation feedback, and the changed regulatory environment we have decided:
View submitted responses where consent has been given to publish the response.
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is seeking feedback on proposals to help ensure ongoing, reliable supply of important medicines.
Medicine shortages have been of particular concern during the COVID-19 pandemic. We have been reviewing the ways in which we can better assist affected Australian patients and their healthcare providers. Specifically, we are seeking feedback on possible reforms that would:
Consultation Paper
The consultation paper gives further details about proposed mechanisms to prevent and mitigate medicine shortages.
We have an important role in managing medicine shortages, to assist patients when they cannot access their usual medicines. While we have mechanisms to allow supply of overseas products to assist with a shortage in Australia, patients still experience difficulties and uncertainty using these options.
There are currently no specific regulatory pathways designed explicity to facilitate registration on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (the ARTG) of medicines with the aim of supporting on-going supply or reducing the likelihood of shortages.
In this consultation paper we have identified four approaches incorporating various administrative, regulatory and legislative mechanisms to reduce regulatory burden on applicants, as possible medicine shortage mitigation or management strategies.
Consultation Scope
We are unable to compel sponsors to make an application for registration and the TGA has no powers to compel ongoing supply of any approved goods. Inclusion on the ARTG often doesn’t equate to supply in the market and stakeholders have raised this with us as a concern. Possible alignment with Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) processes may be required to achieve the full benefits of our proposals; however, consideration of alignment of ARTG registration and PBS listing is outside the scope of this consultation.
Submissions will be reviewed by the TGA. A summary of responses will be published and all submissions will be placed on this website (unless marked confidential or indicated otherwise in the survey or submission form).
Outcomes from the consultation will be provided to the Government for consideration.
Share
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook