Response 537401647

Back to Response listing

About you

What is your organisation?

Organisation
The Australian College of Nursing

Consultation questions (Part 1)

1. Are health professionals familiar with the proposed sole ingredient names listed in Appendix A (both Table 1 and Table 2) in the consultation paper?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Yes
Radio button: Ticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
If no, please tell us which names you think may still be unfamiliar to health professionals.
No, health professionals are not necessarily familiar with the proposed sole ingredient names. The following were considered significantly different from their existing names and are therefore unfamiliar to some members:

- Calcitonin salmon acetate - asparaginase
- doxycycline hyclate - dosulepin hydrochloride
- formoterol fumarate dihydrate - estropipate
- pentoxifylline -hydroxycarbamide
- asparaginase -tetracaine hydrochloride
- alimemazine tartrate - mercaptamine

2. Do you think consumers who are currently using affected medicines are familiar with the new ingredient names?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Yes
Radio button: Ticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Please tell us more
Our members believe it is likely some consumers will be unfamiliar with the new ingredient names, particularly those that differ markedly from the existing names. ACN suggests implementing awareness activities, such as including a QR code sticker on medication packages with a link to the relevant TGA webpage during the dual labelling period, or a printed leaflet provided by the pharmacist at the time of dispensation.

3. Do you agree that all the ingredient names in Table 1 in the consultation paper can be updated to sole names at the end of the dual labelling period?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Yes
Radio button: Ticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Tell us more. If you do not think all ingredient names in Table 1 can be changed to sole names, please tell us which ingredients you think need to be dual labelled for longer, why you think they need to be dual labelled for longer and how long you think they need to remain dual labelled.
ACN suggests continuing dual labelling of the ingredients below from table 1, for a further 12 months beyond the dual labelling period:

- Calcitonin salmon acetate
- doxycycline hyclate
- formoterol fumarate dihydrate
- pentoxifylline

ACN members consider this necessary to promote consumer safety and ensure all consumers affected by the change will have the opportunity to become aware of the change.

4. Do you think mercaptamine should continue to be dual labelled as mercaptamine (cysteamine) for a longer period?

Why? If yes, for how long?
ACN recommends maintaining the dual label for mercaptamine for a further 12 months as the scope of its therapeutic usage and handling is critical and is at higher risk of causing serious adverse outcomes.

5. Do you think the following ingredient names (not currently being used in medicines included in the ARTG) should remain in the dual labelling format in the Ingredients Table for historical and clarity purposes or other reasons?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Why? If yes, please tell us which ingredients and how long you think they need to remain in the dual labelling format.
ACN members suggest that although health care providers will not require a dual label as these ingredient names will be familiar, all of these ingredients should remain dual labelled to ensure direct consumers have more time to become familiar.

6. Do you think the 3-year dual labelling period due to finish on 30 April 2023 should be extended for any other ingredient names in Table 2 in the consultation paper not already mentioned in the previous 2 questions?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Why? If yes, please tell us which ingredient names, and for how long.
ACN recommends extending the dual labelling for Mycobacterium bovis (Bacillus Calmette and Guerin (BCG) strain) for another 12 months as it is very commonly still prescribed as BCG.

7. Please tell us about the impacts if the dual labelling period was extended for any ingredient names. If you are a medicine sponsor, please also tell us the estimated costs of these impacts.

Please tell us about the impacts if the dual labelling period was extended for any ingredient names. If you are a medicine sponsor, please also tell us the estimated costs of these impacts.
This question is beyond our direct remit, however ACN suggest that the extension of dual labelling could give the providers and consumers more time to become familiar with the proposed sole ingredient names. Otherwise, successful familiarisation and public awareness strategies will be entirely reliant on proactive and engaged pharmacists and other health care providers.

8. If the dual labelling period was extended for some ingredients, do you think the main label text size allowances in TGO 91 and TGO 92 would also need to be extended for those ingredients?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Why?
ACN believes the way information is displayed is essential to the safe and quality use of medicines. It is critical the active ingredient is prominently displayed using appropriate placement and font size. [See Australian Government, Department of Health, July 2019. Medicine labels guidance on TGO 91 and TGO 92\. https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default/files/medicine-labels-guidance-tgo-91-and-tgo-92.pdf]

9. Please tell us about any challenges with searching in software systems using old ingredient names that we should consider, particularly if you are or represent software vendors or are a health professional.

Please provide information about challenges with searching in software systems using old ingredient names that we should consider, particularly if you are or represent software vendors or are a health professional.
ACN recommends including the old name in the product description to ensure it is searchable using generic terms, for up to three years. While health care professionals new to the system will easily adapt to the change, it is likely more senior health care providers may need more time to become familiar and adapt their practices beyond the transition period.

10. If you have any further comments or information you would like to share about implications and considerations for the end of dual labelling, please tell us here.

If you have any further comments or information about implications and considerations for the end of dual labelling, please tell us here.
ACN supports all efforts to streamline and optimise health care delivery. However, any innovation must be responsive to the needs of the health workforce and consumers. ACN suggests the transition should be as user friendly and person-centred as possible to ensure maximum benefit and to avoid confusion. Educational resources for pharmacists and other health care providers must be made available, as well as public awareness strategies for different consumer groups.

Consultation questions (Part 2)

11. Do you agree with the proposal to implement a transition period to require medicine labels to be updated with sole ingredient names within a certain timeframe?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Why?
ACN supports the proposal to implement a transition period for medicine labels to be updated with the sole ingredient names to reflect international best practice. This will also assist health practitioners to identify emerging issues in the medical literature and other communication channels. This will reduce the cost burden on manufacturers that currently produce different labels for the same medicines in different markets.
Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Please tell us more
ACN supports the proposal to implement a transition period for medicine labels to be updated with the sole ingredient names to reflect international best practice. This will also assist health practitioners to identify emerging issues in the medical literature and other communication channels. This will reduce the cost burden on manufacturers that currently produce different labels for the same medicines in different markets.

12. Do you agree that PI/CMI documents of affected medicines should also be updated to reflect the sole ingredient name under a transition plan?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Please tell us why and if you think that PI/CMI documents of other medicines that refer to the dual labelled ingredients should also be updated?
Yes, ACN recommends updating PI/CMI of affected medicines and of other medicines that refer to the dual labelled ingredients during the transition phase. PI/CMI is a critical part of medication registration and ensuring consumers are provided accurate information about the safe use of medications.

13. If a transition period was implemented, what do you think the transition time frame should be?

Why?
1 year should be sufficient, provided appropriate, tailored awareness strategies for different health care providers and consumer groups are implemented.

14. Please tell us about the impacts if a transition period was implemented. If you are a medicine sponsor, please provide estimated costs of these impacts.

Please tell us about the impacts if a transition period was implemented. If you are a medicine sponsor, please provide estimated costs of these impacts.
Not applicable.

15. If a transition period was implemented, do you agree with the proposal for sponsors to request updates to labels and/or PI/CMI documents to reflect the updated sole name according to existing legislation and processes?

Please select one item
Radio button: Ticked Yes
Radio button: Unticked No
Radio button: Unticked Unsure
Why?
ACN agrees with the proposal for sponsors to request updated labels and/or PI/CMI documents to reflect the updated sole name according to the existing legislation and process as PI and CMI as it would facilitate clear communication between consumers, health professionals, software vendors and medicine sponsors and support the transition phase.

16. Please tell us if you have any further comments about dual labelled medicine ingredient names.

Please tell us if you have any further comments about dual labelled medicine ingredient names.
ACN is aware some medicine ingredient names in Australia are outdated and differ from the same medicines internationally. This can be confusing for consumers and health care professionals who travel internationally, health care professionals who qualified or practiced overseas or people who access medicine information online. ACN appreciates the TGA’s commitment to align ingredient names in Australia with international naming practices. ACN supports this initiative, provided the change is user-friendly, as labelling has a significant impact on the safe and quality use of medicines. ACN members suggested continuing dual labelling for at least another 12 months, as much of the transition period was during the COVID-19 pandemic and as such may not have been appropriately practiced in health facilities as required.

Publishing your response

18. I consent to the submission made by me being published on the Department’s website, and accessible to the public, including persons overseas, in accordance with the following preference:

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Publish response with both my name and my organisation's name
Radio button: Ticked Publish response, without my name but including my organisation's name
Radio button: Unticked Publish response without my name or my organisation's name (anonymously)
Radio button: Unticked Do not publish response