Response 230127824

Back to Response listing

About you

What is your name?

Full name (Required)
Tina

Which best describes your response?

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Ticked I am responding as an individual
Radio button: Unticked I am responding on behalf of an organisation / institution

Individual

Which best describes you?

Please select one item
Radio button: Unticked Consumer / patient
Radio button: Ticked Registered healthcare professional
Radio button: Unticked Professional researcher
Radio button: Unticked None of the above / I am responding out of personal interest

Option 1 - Requirement for blister packs

Option 1 - Availability of blister packs

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Option 1A
Radio button: Unticked Option 1B
Radio button: Ticked Option 1C
Radio button: Unticked Option 1D
Radio button: Unticked None of the above
Radio button: Unticked No comment
Written response:
I agree with Option 1C but would also add another option to that

As well as continuing to supply in blister packs from all points of purchase, there should also be the option in making paracetamol available in child-safe bottles like what is available for ibuprofen in the Redacted textbrand. This is more needed for larger quantities (48, 50, 96 and 100 tablets) which should only be made available in pharmacies. If there is the concern regarding the supply of larger quantities of paracetamol to the general public, then the option of child-safe bottles should be exhausted. There are other non-prescription medications available in blister packs which also pose a high risk if consumers overdose

Option 2 - Maximum pack sizes

Option 2 - Pack sizes (select all that apply)

Please select all that apply
(Required)
Checkbox: Unticked Option 2A
Checkbox: Unticked Option 2B
Checkbox: Ticked None of the above
Checkbox: Unticked No comment
Written response:
I think the maximum quantity should be 20 x 500mg tablets/capsules for preparations for general sale. There is no screening in grocery stores. In some stores, however, there is a system where customers have a maximum amount they can buy in one transaction. It won’t stop customers shopping from store to store if they want to deliberately overdose. Perhaps a survey should also be done for this to see if people do resort to these techniques

Option 3 - Purchase limits

Option 3 - Purchase limits

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Ticked Option 3A
Radio button: Unticked Option 3B
Radio button: Unticked None of the above
Radio button: Unticked No comment
Written response:
This is a vague option. I agree with Option 3A, but depending on the quantities and where.
For example, in pharmacies, I think up to two boxes of 20 x 500mg can be issued. 40 tablets are a Schedule 2 listed item at the moment. It is up to the pharmacist to determine and make a decision on how much to supply, based on patient assessment. Supplying more than two boxes for any quantity I don’t agree with.

One box of 20 x 500mg should only be supplied at general sales as there is no screening for these purchases

Option 4 - Sale from behind the counter

Option 4 - Sale from behind the counter

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Support
Radio button: Ticked Do not support
Radio button: Unticked Partially support
Radio button: Unticked No comment
Written response:
Based on my previous answer where 20 x 500mg paracetamol tablets can be sold at non-Pharmacy outlets and only one box of this quantity can be supplied

I think it should be made available to the public, especially when needed for emergencies and when a pharmacy is not available. I don’t think it’s fair to deny a self-selection. If it was a higher quantity, then this should only be available in pharmacies

If anything, allow a display and self-selection and should the customer take more than the maximum (let’s say they take two boxes instead of one) then the checkout staff should explain to the customer that only one box can be purchased at a time. This is a time for customers to go to pharmacies for higher quantity purchase

Option 5 - Age restrictions

Option 5 - Age restrictions

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Ticked Option 5A
Radio button: Unticked Option 5B
Radio button: Unticked None of the above
Radio button: Unticked No comment
Written response:
As long as customer is of sound mind and can make decisions. I think this approach is most suitable for general sale but could also be applied to pharmacies (could potentially stretch this to 16 for pharmacies as long as they’re of sound mind)

Option 6 - Modified release paracetamol

Option 6 - Modified release paracetamol

Please select one item
(Required)
Radio button: Unticked Support
Radio button: Unticked Partially Support
Radio button: Ticked Do not support
Radio button: Unticked No comment
Written response:
This will be denying many people another treatment that could be appropriate for them. Ridiculous and totally disagree with this proposal

When paracetamol with codeine was rescheduled in 2018, it was a frustrating time for both patient and pharmacist. In all honesty, it should have stayed as a Schedule 3 but as a recordable item (which it was but the program used was extremely poor. It would have been a better benefit to both practitioners and patients if it was recorded like pseudoephedrine sales which is through Project Stop). The re-scheduling did not make a difference from when it was implemented

There are other medications that I worry about. One example is Redacted textwhich is readily available in 200 tablets. There is a potential for overdose which could also be fatal, yet it is unscheduled. Redacted textis still available and is generally misused when in the wrong hands (which is becoming more frequent)

If there is a concern for overdose, the pack container should be different such as child-safe bottles. There should also be highlighted on the box/bottle the maximum quantity in 24 hours. There should be smaller size options as it’s only available in 96 tablets

This is why there are pharmacists to, check whether sales are appropriate for both indication and quantity

Changing the scheduling should then be followed by changing the scheduling for all medicines which doesn’t make sense. Therefore I don’t support the proposal